<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Software Development Musings from the Editor of Methods &#38; Tools &#187; continuous integration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.martinig.ch/tag/continuous-integration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.martinig.ch</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:14:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Salesmen/Developers Ratio</title>
		<link>http://blog.martinig.ch/software-development/the-salesmendevelopers-ratio/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.martinig.ch/software-development/the-salesmendevelopers-ratio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuous integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hudson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jenkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martinig.ch/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of us might think that software is a technological industry. Maybe. But maybe not. If you consider the biggest organizations that sell software tools like Oracle or Microsoft, I suppose that few of us would consider them as technology leaders, but we will all recognize their financial strength and marketing power. This makes me [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.martinig.ch/software-development/the-salesmendevelopers-ratio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Continuous Integration: Continuous Build or Continuous Quality Control?</title>
		<link>http://blog.martinig.ch/numbers/continuous-integration-continuous-build-or-continuous-quality-control/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.martinig.ch/numbers/continuous-integration-continuous-build-or-continuous-quality-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuous integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martinig.ch/?p=623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last Methods &#38; Tools poll wanted to determine the level of adoption of continuous integration tools  in organizations. We asked the following question: &#8220;Do you use a tool for continuous integration (automated build and unit testing)?&#8221; I use tools for continuous integration 66% My organization has tools, but my project or I do not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.martinig.ch/numbers/continuous-integration-continuous-build-or-continuous-quality-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Software Testing &amp; Quality in Methods &amp; Tools Summer 2010</title>
		<link>http://blog.martinig.ch/methods-tools/software-testing-quality-in-methods-tools-summer-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.martinig.ch/methods-tools/software-testing-quality-in-methods-tools-summer-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Methods & Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuous integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martinig.ch/?p=580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Methods &#38; Tools is a free e-magazine for software developers, testers and project managers. Summer 2010 issue has just been published with the following articles: * Aspects of Kanban &#8211; Lean Worfklow Management * Test Language &#8211; Introduction to Keyword Driven Testing * A High Volume Software Product Line * Better Requirements Definition Management is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.martinig.ch/methods-tools/software-testing-quality-in-methods-tools-summer-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Procedures in Software Configuration Management</title>
		<link>http://blog.martinig.ch/numbers/more-procedures-in-software-configuration-management/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.martinig.ch/numbers/more-procedures-in-software-configuration-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[configuration management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuous integration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martinig.ch/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our last poll examined how software configuration management (change management / version control) is performed by organisations. Is it an informal activity or performed with formal procedures that are validated by an automated tool? 2009 2006 No formal procedure and no tool 13% 15% A formal procedure but no tool. 11% 10% A tool but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.martinig.ch/numbers/more-procedures-in-software-configuration-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: blog.martinig.ch @ 2012-02-09 23:38:03 by W3 Total Cache -->
