<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>From the Editor of Methods &#38; Tools &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.martinig.ch/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.martinig.ch</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Review of 2009 for Software Development: Many Acquisitions and a Funeral</title>
		<link>http://blog.martinig.ch/news/review-of-2009-for-software-development-many-acquisitions-and-a-funeral/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.martinig.ch/news/review-of-2009-for-software-development-many-acquisitions-and-a-funeral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micro Focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mysql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martinig.ch/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year has certainly been busy for the software development tools industry. We have seen many companies merging together and also the funeral of one of the oldest brand in the software development industry.
Bye, Bye Borland
After the sale of its development tools division to Embarcadero in 2008, Borland kept only the tools dealing with requirements [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year has certainly been busy for the software development tools industry. We have seen many companies merging together and also the funeral of one of the oldest brand in the software development industry.<span id="more-464"></span></p>
<p><strong>Bye, Bye Borland</strong></p>
<p>After the sale of its development tools division to Embarcadero in 2008, Borland kept only the tools dealing with requirements management and software testing. This didn&#8217;t improve its financial situation and finally Borland sold itself to MicroFocus. This was a sad end for a brand that accompanied software developer for more than 25 years. Software requirements have always been a secondary topic in the software development tools world and the trend towards agility hasn&#8217;t improved this. Now you can manage user stories with paper cards and a board. Approaches like UML are declining and you will find few items dealing with them in today&#8217;s programmers waterhole like <a href="http://www.dzone.com">dzone.com</a> or <a href="http://stackoverflow.com">stackoverflow.com</a>, The end of Borland is just the symptom that this world is difficult for requirements tools vendors.</p>
<p><strong>Oracle Buys Sun, WMware Buys Spring and You Buy Software</strong></p>
<p>With a little bit of irony, just one year after having bought MySQL, Sun was acquired by Oracle. It is difficult to judge a deal that is not completed yet as the European Commission is still examining the merger. I am however afraid that the business and financial objectives of Oracle will largely lead to the reduction or the end of most of the Sun open source efforts and a serious slowdown in MySQL evolution.</p>
<p>Just after the future of Java becomes a topic of discussion after the deal between Oracle and Sun, WMware decided to acquire SpringSource and to give to this entity a stronger platform to promote the Java language. Since then, SpringSource has launched its Tomcat server version, Enterprise Java Cloud and Spring Roo. Previously it had acquired G2One at the end of 2008 and thus the control of the Groovy and Grails products. It is now surely the most important active player for Java software development tools.</p>
<p><strong>Google is (also) a Software Development Tools Company</strong></p>
<p>Google domination in the search engine world is well known, but as far as developers are concerned, it is amazing how Google is quietly occupying more and more space. Here are some of the software development initiatives of Google:<br />
* <a href="http://code.google.com/appengine/">Google App Engine</a><br />
* <a href="http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/">Google Web Toolkit GWT</a><br />
* <a href="http://golang.org/">Go Language</a><br />
* <a href="http://code.google.com/projecthosting/">Google open source projects forge</a><br />
* <a href=" http://code.google.com/events/io/2010/">Google I/O Conference</a></p>
<p>Google seems to have understood that besides the content, it should also be active in the plumbing that runs the Web. This is why software developers should be interested in what Google does in this area. You could do this following some blogs like the <a href="http://googlecode.blogspot.com/">Google Code Blog</a> and the <a href="http://googletesting.blogspot.com/">Google Testing Blog</a>. You will see that besides the well-known projects, Google releases a lot of interesting open source tools created by its development team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.martinig.ch/news/review-of-2009-for-software-development-many-acquisitions-and-a-funeral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Microsoft Targets Yahoo!</title>
		<link>http://blog.martinig.ch/news/microsoft-targets-yahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.martinig.ch/news/microsoft-targets-yahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martinig.ch/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp today announced that it has made a proposal to Yahoo! to acquire all the outstanding shares of Yahoo! common stock for per share consideration of $31 representing a total equity value of approximately $44.6 billion. Microsoft’s proposal would allow the Yahoo! shareholders to elect to receive cash or a fixed number of shares [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/feb08/02-01CorpNewsPR.mspx">Microsoft Corp today announced that it has made a proposal to Yahoo!</a> to acquire all the outstanding shares of Yahoo! common stock for per share consideration of $31 representing a total equity value of approximately $44.6 billion. Microsoft’s proposal would allow the Yahoo! shareholders to elect to receive cash or a fixed number of shares of Microsoft common stock, with the total consideration payable to Yahoo! shareholders consisting of one-half cash and one-half Microsoft common stock. The offer represents a 62 percent premium above the closing price of Yahoo! common stock on Jan. 31, 2008. Microsoft said it sees at least $1 billion in cost savings generated by the combination, and intends to offer significant retention packages to Yahoo engineers, key leaders and employees. Yahoo! board is currently reviewing Microsoft unsolicited offer.</p>
<p>This is a surprise move but not so much. The main enemy is clear and common for both companies: it is <a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/corporate/index.html">Google</a>. With this alliance, the new company will combine the software producing strength of <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/about/default.mspx">Microsoft</a> and the Internet power of <a href="http://info.yahoo.com/">Yahoo!</a> Despite some recent efforts, Microsoft has never reached a critical mass in term of search engine and on-line advertising power. In this area, Yahoo! has seen its initial franchise decreased every quarter. Yahoo said last Tuesday that it would cut 1,000 jobs from its 14,300-member work force by mid-February, far more than had been expected. </p>
<p>Google is often the number one choice because advertisers and publishers have no real choice if they want to reach a very large audience or benefit from a very diversified supplier source. Yahoo! has yet to react to Microsoft&#8217;s offer, but even if the organizational culture may be different, this merger makes a lot of sense as far as business is concerned. This could also allow Microsoft to put more pressure in Google core on-line business and limit its expansion in the software market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.martinig.ch/news/microsoft-targets-yahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
